Just a little bit diffrent

Been keeping up on the corruption and tired of people who want victim hood rather then solutions and will anything to keep it even Harass and prevent The Fine Young Capitalist ACTUAL feminist from helping women create games by having your friend black list them for no reason to further your own political agenda. #not your shield # Gamer Gate

One of the last few second wave feminst left trying to salvage the efforts of factual based feminism that use to be the standard in the united state till scare tactics and misinformation became the norm.






This is the B-side of college campus rape policies. Instead of taking these cases to the criminal courts where they belong, the colleges try to handle this in-house.

In many cases it is an enforcement of their rape hysteria policy in which any man who is accused gets put to the “he could have done it” test and if he fails, whether he’s innocent or not, he’s kicked out. But the woman, if he is guilty, doesn’t get real justice: prison time for the rapist. This institutionalized misandry hurts the womenfolk here, too.

But then there are cases like this: where the accuser didn’t even get to see the alleged rapist tried in the college kangaroo courts. They just ignored her, and she’s left to pursue justice in this shameful (moreso for the institution than her) manner.

The solution for all of this is simple: when a rape charge is filed, it must automatically go to criminal court. Due process must prevail, or we get tragedies like this.

People who are raped on college campuses should go to the local police force before going to the authorities on your campus; even if you go to one of the larger college campus with their own police force (I don’t mean campus security guards).  College campuses have a reason to want to keep campus crime reports in house because no matter how well or poorly they handle the situation, campus crime is bad advertising.

Campus politics trying to get in the way of justice just to keep their popularity up. Pathetic. 

The amount of red tape you have to go through to involve municipal police departments when there is a crime is astounding.  It is very much about maintaining image because college campuses are a business first.  They care more about public relations than they care about students or the people who work there. In one of my higher ed administration courses, the professor overheard me talking about the time detectives came to ask me and my students about one of their classmates who assaulted the lab coordinator.  We literally  spent 4 hours talking about how much bullshit went into allowing the municipal law enforcement to get involved enough to talk to graduate and undergraduate students.  It was a once a month all afternoon Friday and all day Saturday or weekend course so literally 4 hours straight of being lectured about how to properly handle if a student assaults you. I imagine there are entire courses on what to do if a student is assaulted.  Then he asked if we needed him to bring in a lawyer to discuss the issue further. Even if the others thought it was bullshit and had questions, the first 4 hours was exhausting enough.  I kind of regretted opening my mouth, but my classmate had a question about one of her students that was relative to the story I told. tl/dr Something needs to change so that crime, and the investigation of crime is more transparent.  You should not have to have a course or read a manual to understand the policy of how a crime gets REPORTED from the campus police to the municipal police.  If you are a student on a college campus and you are assaulted, go to the municipal authorities first or deal with the shit ton of red tape. 

For the people asking about whether we should just believe the woman carrying around a mattress; no one (at least neither I nor the OP) are saying she should just be believed.  We are saying that the process shouldn’t be cloak and dagger.  Students should know what to do if they are accused, or if they are assaulted.  The process should be fair and the same for all students.  The accused and accuser should both know their rights; when it comes to rape on campus, it is completely unclear, especially if you are accussed.  It can be interpreted in too many ways.  Beyond that we are talking about assault/ sexual assault.  Those are both felonies.  There is 0 reason for a college campus to handle a felony case in house.  “Petty” campus crimes (noise, pranks, theft under a certain amount) should absolutely be handled in house.  Rape and other assaults  should be handled by the city. tl/dr.  If you are assaulted on a college campus and you are a student, go to the city police.  If you work for them, tell your higher up that you understand the process, but you are reporting it to the police yourself.


God bless this post.

there’s needs to be more projects like this. actually making a difference and not blaming other people hoping they fix their problems for them.

showing corruption in the gaming industry when it comes to the indie games festival.

constructive down the middle video of a much talked about issue and what we can all do to make a impact on it.

Egalitarianism really needs its own movement or at least second wave feminism needs to come back where women were educated about the issues and came up with solutions along with men.

why i do what i do.

Gender really does not tell you anything meaningful at all about what forms of oppression or discrimination any given individual is likely to face. A homeless male war vet up on a felony charge of assault is both legally and socially at a huge disadvantage over someone like me. To simply point to his gender as if that confers an advantage is not only deeply inadequate, it’s worryingly reminiscent of fascism. When facts and realities cannot penetrate deeply held prejudice, it’s time to start dismantling the source of that prejudice. - Janet Bloomfield


Do you have a list of violent crimes perpetrated by self-proclaimed feminists and feminist groups? :)


Violent crimes? Only a few examples. One of which is their violent protest against Warren Farrell when he spoke in Toronto: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0

Another would be this mob of pro-abortion Feminists in Argentina: http://www.lifesitenews.com/horror-mob-of-topless-pro-abort-feminists-attacks-rosary-praying-men-defend.html

Feminists disrupt a forum for battered men: http://youtu.be/qodygTkTUYM

Tumblr users sarah-bunny and feminism-is-your-friend harass and DOXX an Asexual rape victim: http://dontneedfeminism.tumblr.com/post/78589971327/abbeyxmae-serebrii

Tumblr user manhatingfeminist tells a user to kill themselves: http://dontneedfeminism.tumblr.com/post/78734991790/you-need-to-kill-yourself-lol

Tumblr user musemorplsunerd defends a woman who raped an 8 year old boy: http://dontneedfeminism.tumblr.com/post/81918411593/you-do-realize-that-8-year-olds-cannot-give-any-kind-of

Feminists threaten to kill woman for saying men need abuse shelters.

Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide.

Feminists stage mock murders to scare men. 

Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism.

Other than that, I’ll list some occasions of Feminist groups fighting against equality.

Father’s rights group want shared parenting (equal custody) to be the default if both parents want custody and neither parent is unfit.

The NOW fought against this. Multiple times. They also started a propaganda campaign against Father’s Rights Groups.

Men want protection against false rape allegations. They feel that a man’s life should not be ruined simply on the allegation of a woman who may be a vindictive liar. Currently, a woman can accuse a man of rape for no reason, and the man’s name is splashed in the paper and his life is ruined. So, they fought for laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged.

Feminists fought against this as well.

Men want an end to the justice system favoring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men.

Feminists fought against this, arguing that no woman should be sent to jail, even women who had murdered multiple people.

Men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies.

Feminists fought against this by trying to suppress evidence showing that half of domestic violence is done by women, by threatening the researchers with bomb threats, death threats, etc. Modern, younger feminists are doing it as well.

And sadly, they were successful in this effort of propaganda. For decades, and continuing today, violent men are (rightfully) convicted and punished by the state, while violent women are left to freely terrorize and harm their partners.

The feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrest and prosecution philosophies, resulting primarily in having only male batterers criminally pursued.

Men want female rapists to be arrested, charged, and convicted with rape. In Western countries, women are rarely punished when raping men, due to the biased legal system. In some countries, women cannot be punished when raping men, since rape is defined as a male-perpetrated crime.

Feminists fought against this in India, arguing that “there is a physicality [in] rape” and that it would make things “more complicated for judges.”

Feminists fought against this in Israel, claiming that changing the law would result in men filing false rape claims.

Men don’t want to be thrown in jail because they lost their jobs and temporarily cannot pay child support.

Feminists fought against this, trying to lower the amount to $5000 before a man is guilty of a felony for not paying child support. If a man loses a decent-paying job, he will now be a felon, go to jail, lose his right to vote, AND be unable to find future jobs—if he cannot regain an equal-paying job within a few months.

Men want equal economic support and help from the government. When the recession hit, male-dominated fields like construction lost millions of jobs, while female-fields like education and healthcare gained jobs. So the government proposed an economic stimulus for those fields.

Feminists successfully fought against this, arguing that it was discrimination to support men, and caused the government to give money to women who didn’t deserve it. Hundreds of professional feminists complained against the “sexism” of helping men (who had lost jobs) and not women (who had gained jobs).

A representative of the Michigan National Organization for Women testified in opposition to the Revocation of Paternity Act, which stopped the old law which stated that if a woman was married and cheated on her husband, the resulting child is considered to be legally the husband’s and the biological father had no legal rights to fight for custody or parenting time with his biological child.

In other words, the amendment would have “taken away” women’s rights, by treating women exactly the same as men.

Some may argue that these cases of feminists harming men is not “representative” of feminism. I ask you: Are there any cases of feminists helping men? No. Yet, there are many cases of feminists harming men.

It is reasonable to conclude from these facts that feminism fights to harm men.